September 16th, 2019

Good morning <<First Name>>,

We hope you’re feeling refreshed after a relaxing weekend and are ready to take on the new week ahead.  

The third Democratic debates are over, and although little has changed in the polls for the 10 candidates who took to the stage on Thursday evening, Senator Warren maintained her growing momentum and experienced the biggest increase in likely primary voters who were considering supporting her.

But on from the debate we must now move. In this week's newsletter we're delving into a fascinating topic that after years of being consigned to the political hinterland, has recently gained traction amongst the 2020 candidates: Reparations.



How to access the podcasts:

Option 1: Click the yellow link above for the full easy-to-use playlist.  To learn how to download into your preferred podcast app follow the tutorial on our Instagram story.

Option 2: Click on any of the pictures below to go to the individual episode on the podcast host's website, or on the Apple podcast link to take you directly to the Apple podcast app.

The Definition: Reparation
  • "The act of making amends, offering expiation, or giving satisfaction for a wrong or injury." 

40 Acres And A Mule
  • In the aftermath of the American Civil War (1965), Union leaders gathered with black ministers in Savannah to discuss how they could help thousands of newly freed slaves. From that meeting emerged General Sherman’s ‘Field Order 15’ - a plan that designated a large tract of Atlantic coastline to formerly enslaved Americans. It declared that "each family shall have a plot of not more than forty acres of tillable ground” and became known as 40 acres and a mule”.
  • Intended as compensation for the years of unpaid labor and suffering black Americans had endured during slavery, President Lincoln and Congress gave the plan their approval, and soon 40,000 freedmen in the South were settled on around 400,000 acres of new land in Georgia and South Carolina.
  • But then President Lincoln was assassinated, and Sherman’s plans were dashed to the ground. His successor, Andrew Johnson, quickly reversed the order and began returning the land to its former Confederate owners, vetoing another attempt by Congress at issuing compensation.

HR 40
  • Fast forward to 1989 and America still hadn’t addressed the question of compensating black Americans (or their ancestors) for years of bondage and suffering. Congressman John Conyers (D-Mich) thought it was about time. That year, the lawyer and ranking member of the House Judiciary Committee, introduced HR 40, a bill (named after the unfulfilled promise of “40 acres and a mule”) that would set up a commission to explore the impact of slavery and racial discrimination on African Americans, and set out proposals for reparations.
  • “Slavery is a blemish on this nation’s history,” Conyers said, “and until it is formally addressed, our country’s story will remain marked by this blight.” After decades of Jim Crow segregation, African-Americans were, he said, still feeling the impact of racial discrimination in all areas of their lives, from education to housing to healthcare to criminal justice. He introduced this legislation every year for 25 years until his retirement in 2017. But it never even made it to the House floor for debate. Until now.
The Case For Reparations
  • So why are reparations suddenly a front and center issue amongst 2020 Democratic candidates? In no small part because of author Ta-Nahisi Coates, who in 2014 wrote a 15,000-word cover story for The Atlantic entitled “The Case for Reparations”. In it, he reiterated Conyers' argument that African Americans were due compensation both to address years of suffering their ancestors endured under bondage, and for the continued discrimination they’ve been subject to since emancipation, both official and unwritten. "Enslavement reigned for 250 years on these shores,” he said, “when it ended, this country could have extended its hallowed principles of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness to all. But America had other things in mind." 
  • Coates’ essay propelled the idea of financial compensation for the descendants of slaves right to the center of US public discourse. Five years on and we have just seen the first congressional hearing on reparations take place in over a decade. Held on June 19th, it coincided with ‘Juneteenth’, a holiday that celebrates the emancipation of slaves in the U.S.
  • During the hearing, lawmakers heard testimony from eight witnesses on the topic of House Resolution 40,  which was recently reintroduced to Congress by Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee (D-Texas). Amongst the speakers was Presidential hopeful, Senator Cory Booker, who secured 12 co-sponsors for a companion bill to Rep. Sheila Jackson Lee's legislation. Here are the main points of debate relayed throughout the hearing.
For Reparations
  • In one of the most memorable moments of the hearing, Ta-Nehisi Coates rebutted Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell's suggestion that no one alive today bears any responsibility for how black Americans were treated years ago. “It’s impossible to imagine America without the inheritance of slavery,” Coates said. “For a century after the Civil War, black people were subjected to a relentless campaign of terror. Victims of that plunder are very much alive today. I am sure they’d love a word with the majority leader.” 
  • Coates was joined by longtime reparations advocate, actor Danny Glover, who argued: “A national reparations policy is a moral, democratic and economic imperative”, highlighting that his great-grandmother was a former slave. 
  • Presidential hopeful, Senator Cory Booker, said that the U.S. has “yet to truly acknowledge and grapple with the racism and white supremacy that tainted this country’s founding and continues to cause persistent and deep racial disparities and inequality.” 
  • Economist Julianne Malveaux highlighted the need for lawmakers to address structural inequalities affecting black Americans. "When zipcode determines what kind of school that you go to, when zipcode determines what kind of food you eat - these are the vestiges of enslavement that a lot of people don't want to deal with."
Against Reparations
  • Coleman Hughes, an undergraduate philosophy major at Columbia University and a columnist at Quillette, testified first to the sound of boos from the audience as she argued that black people don’t need “another apology”. “I’m not saying acknowledging history doesn’t matter. It does. I’m saying there’s a difference between acknowledging history and allowing history to distract us from the problems we face today,” she said. “We need safer neighborhoods and better schools. We need a less punitive criminal justice system. We need affordable healthcare. And none of these things can be achieved through reparations for slavery.”
  • The second Republican witness, African-American former NFL player Burgess Owens, similarly rejected the bill, arguing: "What strangers did to other strangers 200 years ago has nothing to do with us because that has nothing to do with our DNA." 
  • Congressman Mike Johnson, a Louisiana Republican, spoke against "the injustice of monetary reparations from current taxpayers for the sins of a small subset of Americans from many generations ago".
What The Public Thinks
  • While the topic of reparations may be gaining political currency in the lead up to the 2020 election, according to a recent poll the majority of Americans (67%) oppose the government giving cash payments to slaves' descendants.
  • However, 29% of Americans do support reparations, including the majority of black Americans (73%).
What The Other Candidates Think
  • Senators Kamala Harris, and Elizabeth Warren, and former Housing and Urban Development Secretary Julián Castro, have said history supports calls for restitution. Spiritual author, Marianne Williamson, notably wants to set aside $200 billion to $500 billion for a reparations program, while other candidates have said they’re interested in delving into the issue in greater depth.  
  • Sen. Bernie Sanders has suggested that instead of reparations, focus should be on introducing policies that help disadvantaged communities in general, since that would in turn aid black communities in particular. Nonetheless, he has since signed on to Booker’s reparations legislation.
  • As discussions around what an American reparations program would look like continue, antecedent programs are often brought up as examples of how such an initiative might be structured. Some of the clearest examples from history include those set up by Germany for the victims of the Holocaust; by South Africa to compensate the victims of apartheid; by the U.S. to compensate the victims of Japanese internment during World War II; and by the state of North Carolina to make amends for its forced sterilization programs in the mid-20th century. 
  • However, recently we have begun to see reparations programs specifically aimed at compensating the descendants of enslaved people emerge at a more local level in the U.S., potentially paving the way for larger initiatives. One such example was started earlier this year at Georgetown University. Students there voted to tax themselves $27.20 per semester in order to generate a fund that would help the descendants of slaves who, they highlight, the university profited from. One of the students who helped start the fund commented: “Students voted yes because they believe they have a financial obligation to commit to reconciliation with descendants.” The plan is still waiting on approval from the University's board of trustees.
  • Also amongst the first American institutions to designate money for reparations is Virginia Theological Seminary. Earlier this month, leaders there announced plans to create a $1.7 million reparations fund aimed at compensating the descendants of enslaved laborers who worked on its campus over a century ago. The fund will also give compensation to black seminarians and worshipers who have experienced discrimination on campus. 
So what happens next...
  • As candidates discuss the idea of reparations, what we don't yet know is how, or if, this will translate into concrete proposals for reparations initiatives that could actually be rolled out in practice. We wait and see. 



When Andrew Johnson came to power he rescinded the federal promise of '40 acres and a mule' and immediately began returning land to its former owners. Sapelo - the fourth largest in a chain of coastal Georgia islands - is one of the only places where people who were initially given that 40 acres managed to keep ahold of it. But not without a fight.
In this episode, we hear one Sapelo resident, Nettye, describe her struggle to maintain control over land that has belonged to her family for three generations, and which they have paid property tax bills on for 100 years. Suddenly, Nettye doesn’t have the right paperwork and the local government is claiming the land was never really hers. Through Nettye's story we see the past, and present, reality of ‘40 acres and a mule’.



In this episode, the New Yorker’s David Remnick speaks to author Ta-Nehisi Coates about his seminal essay that made the case for reparations. Five years on Remnick asks what form does he thinks reparations might take; which Democratic candidates appear most committed to the topic; and how different is the case for reparations in the context of 2019.


This rounds up our deep dive, but stay tuned as we will revisit this important issue in a future newsletter.

2020: The Election


Former Vice President, Joe Biden, has been the clear frontrunner in the race to become the Democratic Presidential nominee since he first declared his candidacy in late April. Consistently polling at around 30%, with a roughly 10% lead on distant second, Bernie Sanders, Biden is easily the most recognizable face in the party’s over-crowded field, not to mention the candidate with the most extensive government service. But experience comes with age and it’s his age that may prove a problem. If elected, Biden would be 78 when he entered the White House, making him the oldest president to take office. Notoriously gaffe-prone, he’s made a number of recent mistakes on the campaign trail that some have put down to his ailing memory and declining health, raising concerns as to whether he is fit enough for office. 

But Obama’s former right-hand man remains convinced that his experience, knowledge, and understanding of the role of the President makes him the candidate with the greatest probability of beating President Trump in 2020. In this episode, Biden speaks to the NPR politics team from Iowa on why voters should pick him.



Words by: Emma-Louise Boynton
Editing by: Jim Cowles, Stacy Perez and Emma-Louise Boynton
We hope you'll want to share our newsletter with your friends. If so, please direct them to our website where they too can subscribe. 


Tell us the topics you'd love to hear more about.
Suggest a podcast episode we might like.
Or just say hi.
You have a direct line to our ears.
We can't wait to hear from you.
Copyright © The Venn Media LLC / All Rights Reserved 
Content discovered by The Venn Media and our community — copyright is owned by the publisher, not The Venn Media, and audio streamed directly from their servers.


This email was sent to <<Email Address>>
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
The Venn Media · P.O. Box 334 · Teton Village, Wyoming 83025 · USA