July 22nd, 2019

Good morning <<First Name>>,

WE BE BURNIN' in this heatwave and dreaming of cooler days. But still, we hope you managed to stay cool, calm and hydrated and enjoyed an ice cream or two in ode to National Ice Cream Day (Sunday). We duly celebrated with a very generous supply of creamy goodness here at The Venn offices. Summer diet say what?!
In today's newsletter we're bringing you the much anticipated, final installment of our three-part series on... the biggest existential threats facing the U.S., as described during the first Democrat primary debates. So, this week we're turning to China, a topic that is seldom out of the headlines these days. Starting the week right, as always.



How to access the podcasts:

Option 1: Click the yellow link above for the full easy-to-use playlist.  To learn how to download into your preferred podcast app follow the tutorial on our Instagram story.

Option 2: Click on any of the pictures below to go to the individual episode on the podcast host's website, or on the Apple podcast link to take you directly to the Apple podcast app.


The Definition: World Trade Organization
  • According to Investopedia: "A global organization made up of 164 member countries that deals with the rules of trade between nations." 

The Issue
  • Throughout the 2016 Presidential race, then-Republican candidate, Donald Trump, continually attacked China’s trade policy, accusing the country of “raping” the United States and damaging U.S. businesses through manipulating its currency to make its exports more competitive globally. In his campaign platform, he pledged to cut a better deal with China aimed at bolstering the competitiveness of American businesses and protecting their workers, while putting "an end to China's illegal export subsidies and lax labor and environmental standards." 
  • But Trump’s election in 2016 didn’t mark the start of America’s confrontation with China over trade. Instead, it represented a key moment in a bigger story that effectively started in 2001, when China entered the World Trade Organization (WTO).
  • In order to join the global trading group, China agreed to lower its trade barriers and follow the standard set of international trade practices that guided the other participating nations. At the time, many thought China’s entry into the WTO would deliver big benefits to the U.S., including greater access to Chinese markets for American companies, and a boost in U.S. job growth thanks to increased trade exports. But, the benefits of trade liberalization with China failed to deliver. 
  • Instead, China’s exports to the U.S. vastly overtook its imports from the U.S., causing the bilateral deficit to expand rapidly, which seriously impacted the employment and wages of many American workers. As it turns out, the U.S. wasn’t prepared for the scale or speed of the impact that Chinese exports would have on its manufacturing sector.
  • There is bipartisan sentiment in Washington that Chinese trade practices pose a serious problem for the U.S. According to the CATO institute, the issue can be summarized as follows: “China’s mercantilist state systematically discriminates against foreign products and foreign producers in China while forcing foreign companies to hand over their intellectual property (IP) as the price of access to China’s large and growing market. China engages in widespread cheating in its trade practices, including not only high tariffs, domestic content requirements, and other traditional forms of protectionism, but also rigged regulations that erect trade barriers by favoring Chinese companies and outright theft of foreign IP.” The Trump administration believes that under current WTO rules there is little the U.S. can do to combat such practices. 
  • As a result, Trump has stayed true to his promise to get tough on China by launching an all-out trade offensive that has involved imposing tariffs on $250 billion worth of Chinese goods. Although Trump reached a temporary truce with Chinese President Xi Jinping earlier this month, the existing tariffs remain in place.

What the Candidates Say On Climate Change:
  • Many Democrat candidates support President Trump’s goal of taking on China and addressing unfair trade practices, but oppose the way he’s going about it. An over-reliance on tariffs is, many argue, economically damaging and, as Senator Kamala Harris (D-CA) has suggested, ultimately “counterproductive”. 
  • During the first Democrat debates, a number of candidates singled out China as the biggest geopolitical threat facing our country. Here’s what some of them said:
  • Mayor Pete Buttigieg: "China is using technology for the perfection of dictatorship. Manufacturers and especially farmers are hurting. Tariffs are taxes and Americans pay on average $800 more a year because of the tariffs. Meanwhile, China is investing so they could soon be able to run circles around us in artificial intelligence and this president is fixated on the relationship as if all that mattered was the balance on dishwashers. We have a moment when their authoritarian model is an alternative to ours because ours looks so chaotic because of internal divisions. The biggest thing we have to do is invest in our own domestic competitiveness."
  • Sen. Michael Bennet (D-CO): "The president has been right to push back on China, but has done it in completely the wrong way. We should mobilize the entire rest of the world who all have a shared interest in pushing back on China's mercantilist trade policies and I think we can do that."
  • Andrew Yang (Leader of the #YangGang): "The tariffs and the trade war are just punishing businesses and producers and workers on both sides... We need to crack down on Chinese malfeasance in the trade relationship, but the tariffs and the trade war are the wrong way to go."


The U.S. and China have now been embroiled in a trade war for over a year. The U.S. has placed 25% tariffs on $250 billion of Chinese goods, and Trump is still threatening to impose additional tariffs on another $325 billion of Chinese products. But when did trade with China become such a problem for the U.S.? And how do worsening trade relations impact the future of the American economy?
In this episode, The Daily delves into the history of U.S.- Sino (that’s China) trade relations and examines the impact China’s entry into the global marketplace, and its quick succession to becoming the planet’s top global manufacturing base, has had on U.S. jobs and industry. 
By failing to anticipate and prepare for the rapid loss of U.S. manufacturing jobs that followed, policy-makers forgot a key economic principle: “when you liberalize trade, there are winners and there are losers”. It’s been U.S. workers who’ve lost out. 



5G is expected to be up to a hundred times faster than our current wireless networks. The claims surrounding what this would mean for the future are almost incomprehensible, from pumping twelve trillion dollars into the global economy by 2035, and creating some twenty-two million new jobs in the U.S. alone, to generating a whole new Internet of Things founded upon a higher degree of hyper-connectivity. 
But alongside the supposed fruits promised by a 5G-enabled ‘fourth revolution’ lies significant risks: a hyper-connected world is a world in which cyberattacks are far more likely. 
So why is China at the center of concerns surrounding the threats 5G may pose to the U.S., and to the rest of the world? Because Huawei, a Chinese telecom company, is currently the global leader in 5G technology and is suspected of being a conduit to Chinese intelligence by many U.S. government officials, most notably Trump. What’s more, thanks to large subsidies from the Chinese government, it has been able to aggressively sell its systems at cut-rate prices to U.S. markets.
In this episode, Today Explained examines the cyber security threat posed by Huawei’s 5G networks and what the U.S. government is doing to try and stop them.



In 2013, Chinese President Xi Jinping announced the launch of the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) - an ambitious infrastructure development and investment plan that would span from East Asia to Europe. The initiative seeks to create an expansive network of Chinese-built railways, energy pipelines, highways, and border crossings, and has already cost China an estimated $200 billion. More than sixty countries (two-thirds of the world’s population) have either signed onto projects, or suggested they intend to do so. The initiative has sparked concern amongst some in Asia and the U.S. who fear it is a guise for China-led military and regional expansion - “a new version of colonialism” enabled by BRI countries' financial indebtedness to China.
In this episode, News in Focus discusses the strategic significance of China’s Belt and Road Initiative, and what it means for the rest of the world.


This rounds up our deep dive, but stay tuned as we will revisit to this important issue in a future newsletter.

2020: The Election 
Getting to know the candidates


“If history is any guide, the people that are leading the race today are not going to be the nominee.” - Sen. Bennet

In the overcrowded field of Democrat candidates, Colorado Senator Michael Bennet is confident he can win the Presidency. Why? Because he is the only candidate in the running who has won a national race in a swing state, twice - Colorado is a purple state, split exactly a third Republican, a third Democrat and a third independent. The former lawyer and businessman, who was also the superintendent of Denver public schools for five years, says he understands the grievances that led people to vote for Trump in 2016 and he is uniquely experienced to solve them. To this end, a key tenet of his campaign is tackling the country’s rising level of economic inequality and the “never-ending recession” he says 90% of Americans have faced for the past 40 years. 
So what exactly is Senator Bennet’s plan to get to the White House? In this podcast interview with Recode’s Kara Swisher, he sets out his blueprint for winning the Presidency and transforming the U.S. economy. 


We hope you'll want to share our newsletter with your friends. If so, please direct them to our website where they too can subscribe. 


Tell us the topics you'd love to hear more about.
Suggest a podcast episode we might like.
Or just say hi.
You have a direct line to our ears.
We can't wait to hear from you.
Copyright © The Venn Media LLC / All Rights Reserved 
Content discovered by The Venn Media and our community — copyright is owned by the publisher, not The Venn Media, and audio streamed directly from their servers.


This email was sent to <<Email Address>>
why did I get this?    unsubscribe from this list    update subscription preferences
The Venn Media · P.O. Box 334 · Teton Village, Wyoming 83025 · USA