Copy
View this email in your browser

Mother Teresa joyfully at work in Calcutta
Chosen in view of Sunday's gospel, of which John Pilch wrote:
By touching the “leper” Jesus challenges his culture’s judgment.

Scripture readings, February 14, 6th Sunday of Ordinary Time

(Click here for complete texts)
(Haga clic aquí para textos en español)

Quick Summaries:

1st reading: Leviticus is a book primarily about the holiness of God, and the ritual holiness or cleanliness needed to serve God worthily. For Levitical priests, that included not being a leper and avoiding contact with lepers.

2nd reading: In pagan Corinth, many people sacrificed food and drink to their gods. The idols didn't eat it, and their priests resold some of it as groceries. Christians wondered if they could eat such food. Saint Paul gives a wise answer in a broader context.

Gospel reading: Jesus touches and heals a leper in this passage. In the ancient context, that touching was more remarkable than the healing.
Join a Zoom discussion of the readings and this message,

Thursday, February 11, 10:00 a.m. CST (US-Chicago)
(UTC -6)

At or after that time, click this link to join:

https://us02web.zoom.us/j/81301059290

Or from any Zoom app enter meeting ID: 813 0105 9290

No password required.
You are a Christian Community leader. Thank you.

Saint Paul's First Letter to the Corinthians addresses several community problems, but we decided not to tackle all that text in our Sunday liturgies. That's arguably for the best (unless you're a Protestant). So think of each of our liturgical selections from the letter as a short description on a menu, not an entrée itself. You can always order an entrée and enjoy it, and that means opening your own copy of the letter and chewing on it. There's nourishment there for your spirit, for your community, and maybe a way to help your community nourish its neighborhood and the world.

This Sunday the menu reads:

Whether you eat or drink, or whatever you do,
do everything for the glory of God.
Avoid giving offense, whether to the Jews or
Greeks or the church of God,
just as I try to please everyone in every way,
not seeking my own benefit but that of the many,
that they may be saved.
Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ.

The meaty question behind "whether you eat or drink" is an early church controversy arising from the cosmopolitan Gentile milieu of ancient Corinth. In pagan temples there, worshipers and their priests regularly sacrificed animals before the idols of their gods. We don't know how much animal flesh the gods consumed, but there were plenty of leftovers, so the worshipers and the priests could take some home, and the temple could sell some through local markets.

What's this have to do with giving offense to Jews, Greeks (Gentiles), or the church? Well some felt that the meat was tainted, in a moral/spiritual sense, by passing through idolatrous liturgies in the pagan temples. To partake of it would seem to assent to the validity of the pagan worship and to affirm the reality of their gods. Furthermore, Christians of Jewish background took a harder line on this than some Christians of Gentile origin. (That difference is one you would expect.)

And remember Corinth is in Greece, where philosophers had long been asserting the power of reason, and democratic advocates had long opposed tyrants and thought-control. So some Corinthian Christians argued that the squeamish ought to get over it because the idols are just that, the pagan gods don't really exist, and we all should just know better, not letting ourselves be restrained.

Saint Paul's pastoral response is on the side of restraint. He bluntly prohibits Christians from participating in pagan sacrifices, and deftly proposes Eucharistic food and drink as alternatives that are real and that bind us to Christ. But as for food previously offered to idols, he recommends avoiding it, no matter how smart one's theology. That's a kindness to the whole community, reducing scandal and division. Eating those goods, while permissible, is not useful. There's a lot, Paul says, that's permissible but not useful.

Finally to wrap up his wrap-up of his lengthy discussion, Paul says, "Be imitators of me, as I am of Christ." He's referring to his overall restraint in asserting his rights. In prior verses he said he could demand material support from the Corinthian church, as apparently other missionaries had, but he does not. He didn't travel there because the Corinthians hired him, but because Christ's gospel compelled him, and that was enough to make him forego certain rights.

We're quite willing to declare some things tainted, and we sometimes boycott them. Union members don't cross picket lines. Lovers of justice and advocates for the poor don't buy goods that come from sweatshops. Remember when the farm workers in California asked us not to be grapes until the growers recognized their union? I do, and I remember how critical I was then of a seminary classmate who bought grapes, for a Labor Day picnic, no less. I was not as kind and understanding as Saint Paul would have wanted. Lots of American Catholics boycott the political party of their working-class parents and immigrant grandparents because the party's wrong on abortion rights. The alternative party's disdain for many a Catholic social-justice position bothers them less.

There are some big, complex and scandalous elephants in the room, that would split our church and nullify our mission to be a sign of saving unity in the world (Vatican II, Lumen Gentium, chapter II, paragraph 9). We're looking for ways to be truthful and faithful without alienating Christians whose priorities haven't developed the same way ours have. (What an artful sentence!) We want to hold it together.

But the spirit of this age urges every side to be more emphatic, more extreme, more divisive, more derisive of our foes, more oblivious of our own contradictions. It feels like we're walking on eggshells. It's uneasy in the church, but far worse in national politics, where we can't invoke any higher power. There it feels like the gates of hell! May they not prevail.

******************

Dedication:

As I was writing this message, sadly I learned of the death of Patrick Fuller, once of Arnold, Missouri and lately of Carmel, Indiana. I've admired and loved Pat since he joined my college seminary class in 1965. His honesty and generosity were among the things that made him successful in business. He loved the church and its missions of charity, serving several terms as Grand Knight of the Knights of Columbus in Indiana, and establishing libraries of healthy spiritual books for inmates in numerous federal prisons. He was devoted to his wife Kris and their children and grandchildren. He was unafraid to change his mind. Pat liked these messages and the live discussions over Zoom, usually bringing in friends from church. Rest in peace, Pat.
 
Other sources of commentary
on Sunday's readings:
 

 

Introduction to this Message Series


I'm Greg Warnusz, of Holy Name of Jesus Catholic Church, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA, since the church's founding in 2005; author of Lector's Notes at https://lectorprep.org since 1999; and web steward for FOSIL since about 2011.

This, the 47th message in a (mostly) weekly series, aims to help you apply the Bible readings you'll hear in church (or would hear if your church weren't locked down) to the life of the parish (or other Christian community) that you hold dear.

These are not devotionals (which are everywhere). I'm offering what I learned in the seminary, this intellectually honest way to read the Bible:
  1. Learn what the writer of the Bible passage was trying to help his or her ancient community cope with (my specialty).
  2. Ask how your own community today is dealing with something like that (your specialty).
  3. Suggest the connections, craft a biblical approach to your community's mission.
  4. Remember Bible passages were composed for whole communities, not just for individuals.
  5. Then the rest is up to you (readers / listeners), your communities, and the Holy Spirit.
Step 1), above, is the hardest. I offer this because I'm grateful for the seminary education I received and the continuing education I enjoy. Step 2) is my passion because my beloved parish community faces serious demographic challenges and will soon face ecclesiastical ones.

This is a new endeavor, likely to improve with age. Next week's may be shorter. It takes 3 years for Catholic and most Protestant churches to complete their Sunday surveys of the whole bible. Stick with me. Thank you.
Twitter
Facebook
Website
Copyright © 2021 Parish Leaders, All rights reserved.


Want to change how you receive these emails?
You can update your preferences or unsubscribe from this list.
(If you got this forwarded from a friend, the above is not the way to unsubscribe.)

Email Marketing Powered by Mailchimp